23948sdkhjf
Log in or create to bookmark articles
Get access to all content on Life Science Nordic
No commitment or card information required
Applies to personal subscription only.
Contact us for a enterprise solution.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Krönika: Can regulators keep up with innovation?

New technology has increased the understanding of disease mechanisms and enabled approval of products targeting small but specific patient populations; sometimes referred to as precision medicine. Gene- and cell therapies have reached the market, exemplified by CAR-T cells, and the research pipeline is promising. In addition, the medical device field is constantly growing creating new solutions to address patient needs.
Advertisement

Regulators in EU have developed tools to stimulate research and development where the medical need is high. Examples of such initiatives are PRIME designation with possibilities of repeated scientific advice from the agencies, clinical protocol assessments, special support to SME including fee reduction. Orphan drug regulation is not a new regulation but has gained increased interest over the last 5-10 years and just looking at the last few years about 20% of the approvals have been orphan products. The orphan regulation was developed to stimulate research also in rare diseases and has been successful from that perspective. This is of course positive, since new effective treatments are available to patients for whom the medical need is high.

Advertisement

By direction from the government, the Medical Products Agency in Sweden is committed to support researchers with the tools available to the agency. They offer scientific and regulatory advice to guide development of medicinal product, about 200 advices per year, and provide education especially around new legislation such as the new MT-regulation. Although very important, these activities have to be balanced versus the role as an independent and reliable government agency that will later assess and approve the same drug products

Advertisement

This positive scientific progress leads to new regulatory challenges and subsequent development of new legislation and guidelines. One challenge for regulators is that the underlying data is limited making the risk-benefit decision difficult. In this context, ”real world evidence” obtained after the product has been placed on the market is of great importance and may be a subject for another blog.

Advertisement

Regulators are open to early dialogues with industry which will help both parties making science-based decisions. Regulatory agencies create opportunities in the innovation process and companies are wise to use these. But, do not forget that innovation and development is driven by researchers in academia and industry, and not by regulators.

Marie Gårdmark, PhD, CEO, Senior Consultant RegSmart Life Science.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Science Sweden See topic
Advertisement Advertisement
BREAKING
{{ article.headline }}
0.125|